Discussion Questions: “Historical
Fiction” and Number the Stars
Small Group Work/Class Discussion
1.
Hintz
and Tribunella explain that historical children’s fiction frequently intersects
with trauma theory (239). What kinds of trauma are being worked through in this
text? Consider both cultural and personal (i.e. familial) forms of trauma.
a.
The
authors add that children are often portrayed, in stories concerning trauma, as
either “extremely vulnerable” or “especially resilient and adaptable” (239). Is
Annemarie portrayed as more “extremely vulnerable” or “especially resilient and
adaptable”? Ellen? Kirsti?
2.
A
great deal of the national and familial trauma that sets the stage for the book
has taken place in the past and is revealed through stories and memory. Why
might Lowry have chosen to take this approach?
3.
What
is the significance of food in the text?
4.
Describe
the threat of the Nazis as it is portrayed in the book. How frightening are
they? Do you find this level of fear appropriate for intermediate readers?
5.
More
than any other text we have read so far, Number
the Stars depicts the sudden maturation of a protagonist from childhood to
adulthood (or at least something beyond childhood). Find at least one instance
of this and discuss what it implies about the difference between childhood and
adulthood.
6.
What
statements is the book making about the relationship between bravery and
ignorance? Do you agree with these statements?
7.
Do
you sense any other didacticism in the text? If so, where?
8.
Part
of Annemarie’s ability to “save the day” comes from her ability to perform the
part of a “silly, empty-headed little girl” (105). What is the significance of
this in terms of themes within the text? Within the larger scope of our study
of children’s literature and notions of childhood?
9.
Where
are adults made to seem reliable and steadfast in this text? Where are they made
to seem vulnerable? What effect does this have on you as adult readers, and
what adult do you think it may have on intermediate readers?
10.
In
what ways does the Afterword change your understanding of the text?
11.
What
is the significance of the text’s title, and how does this relate to its
overall themes?
12.
Hintz
and Tribunella ask, “Does historical fiction have a responsibility to remain
completely faithful to the historical record? […] What makes certain
inaccuracies acceptable and others not?” (250). Discuss these questions.
13.
Hintz
and Tribunella state that nationalism is a large part of historical fiction. In
what ways is this text nationalistic?
14.
Do
you sense any examples of presentism in this text?
15.
Overall,
do you find this to be a “believable” story? Would you assign it in a unit on
World War II? Why or why not?
No comments:
Post a Comment