Discussion Questions: “Race,
Ethnicity, and Culture,” “Printz Award Winner Speech,” American Born Chinese, and The
Snowy Day
Small Group Work/Class Discussion: “Race,
Ethnicity, and Culture”
1.
Hintz
and Tribunella state that early representations of people of color “bolstered
their creator[s’] confidence in the racial hierarchies they embraced” (346). How
do visual representations do this? What about other kinds of representations
(characters’ personalities, behaviors, etc.)?
2.
What
is the difference between “race” and “ethnicity,” as explained by Hintz and
Tribunella? Why might cultural studies scholars have differentiated between
them?
3.
Hintz
and Tribunella state that some works “suggest that the ‘ethnic’ child or family
is really just like the unmarked ‘mainstream’ family underneath superficial
cultural differences, while other works emphasize the uniqueness of identity
and experience” (355). What are the advantages and drawbacks to each of these
approaches?
4.
Hintz
and Tribunella quote Michael Cart: “Can a writer’s imagination be powerful
enough to create a viable work of fiction about a culture the writer has
observed only from the outside?” (359). What do you think? Furthermore, what
are the implications of believing that imagination is powerful enough to do
this?
5.
Hintz
and Tribunella observe that perspective greatly affects the impact of a story
(364). How do the three perspectives of American
Born Chinese affect its representation of race and ethnicity?
6.
To
what extent do you think problematic, even racist texts, can be “reclaimed”?
Small Group Work/Class Discussion: “Printz
Award Winner Speech”
1.
Yang
asks himself, “By going from library to library and school to school,
evangelizing librarians and teachers on the virtues of graphic novels, was I
robbing comics of their cool?” (11). To what extent do you agree that this
might be a concern? What does this imply about the relationship between young
adults (particularly intermediate readers, grades 4-8) and adults?
2.
Yang
asserts, “In a data-rich society like twenty-first-century America, we need
information experts to prevent complex ideas from condensing into polarized,
essentially meaningless sound bites” (12). To what extent do you agree that
young readers need “information experts” to help them navigate complex texts?
To what extent do you think authors have a responsibility to acknowledge the
ways in which complex ideas condense into “meaningless sound bites”? Should
they adjust their texts accordingly?
3.
Yang
states that those who choose to work with young adults “enlisted […] in the
frontlines” of the struggle to encourage media literacy and discourage snap
judgments in readers. As future teachers, to what extent do you agree? What are
some strategies for accomplishing this?
Small Group Work/Class Discussion: The Snowy Day
1.
What
are you first impressions of The Snowy
Day, in light of our discussions?
2.
Remember
that this text was authored and illustrated by a Jewish American man. Does this
knowledge change your interpretation of the text? Why or why not?
3.
Consider
the opposing arguments about The Snowy
Day on pages 374-375 of Hintz and Tribunella. Do you agree with one set
more than the other? Why or why not?
4.
To
what extent should the author’s intentions be taken into account when
evaluating the problematic implications of a text?
No comments:
Post a Comment